Not sure what your scheme should carry?
Send us your project and where it is. A Senior Architect will give you an initial appraisal and guide you as to what to do next.
Start a conversationA deed that travels with the land and three tests every obligation must pass.
A section 106 agreement is a deed binding land to the obligations a planning permission needs: affordable homes, payments, limits on use. Each must be necessary, directly related to the scheme and fairly and reasonably related to it in scale and kind; in practice the permission issues once the deed is signed.
An outline permission settles that homes can be built. The section 106 settles what comes with them and it binds whoever builds them.
The site was two-thirds of a hectare of pasture on the edge of Little Kimble in Buckinghamshire, outside any settlement boundary, which had never carried a planning application. The landowner wanted to know whether it held residential value and to sell it with a consent.
Members resolved to grant in November 2019, subject to a planning obligation. The permission was issued on 30 March 2020, four and a half months later. That time went on the deed: the permission was issued the day it was signed.
The agreement secured the affordable housing: no less than 48 per cent of the homes, at least 80 per cent of them for affordable or social rent and the rest shared ownership. It also secured a contribution to off-site highway safety. The landscaping and the drainage rate were fixed by condition, which is where the Framework prefers such things.
For a landowner, the permission is the moment value is created and the deed is what a buyer prices into it. A consent is worth what it commits the builder to as much as what it permits.
The outline settled the principle, the number of homes and the affordable obligation. It left the design to whoever bought the land. The housebuilder that did took it through reserved matters and built it.
Five homes near Bicester. The council wanted the site treated as one with the land next door, to deliver affordable housing and infrastructure contributions; it would have refused the site on its own. The Inspector found no policy requiring that and no reason for a legal agreement.
Twenty-five homes on the edge of Rugby, granted at committee on heads of terms for five affordable bungalows and contributions to open space, sport and sustainable travel. A health contribution was left out, the council finding it did not meet the legal tests.
Apartments and townhouses on a long-vacant site in a Northampton conservation area. The council's own independent assessor agreed the scheme could not carry affordable housing or section 106 contributions and stay viable. It was granted without either.
Nine homes in the Cotswolds National Landscape, refused by the council and allowed at appeal. A unilateral undertaking secured three affordable homes and a contribution for a nearby protected habitat site; the Inspector found both met the legal tests.
Every planning application we make in our own name is a matter of public record on a council register, and ours reach more than 100 planning authorities across the UK.
Architects for housing schemes →Send us your project and where it is. A Senior Architect will give you an initial appraisal and guide you as to what to do next.
→ Start a conversationMany schemes never need one. National guidance expects affordable housing to be sought only from major development, which for housing means ten or more homes or a site of half a hectare or more, although local plans in designated rural areas can set a lower threshold.
Below that, a deed should only be needed where a condition will not do the job, such as a payment or a transfer of land, which the Framework says conditions should not require.
The Community Infrastructure Levy, where charged, pays for most general infrastructure. The agreement covers affordable housing (which the levy may not fund) and mitigation specific to the site.
The Framework of August 2026 says obligations should only be used where a condition cannot deal with the impact (policy DM6), so a request for a deed to secure something a condition could secure is worth questioning.
Most agreements carry some mix of four kinds of obligation and every one has to pass the same three legal tests.
A share of the homes as affordable housing, such as social rent, affordable rent, shared ownership or discounted sale, set by the local plan, with the tenure, the transfer to a provider and the timing written into the deed.
Payments towards what the development itself creates a need for: school places, highways, open space, sport and health. Each has to be justified by the scheme's own impact, not by a shortfall that exists anyway.
Restrictions on how a building is used or who may live in it, such as student tenure, local occupancy or an age limit. They bind every later owner, which is why buyers and lenders read them closely.
Obligations that make up for harm elsewhere: contributions for protected habitat sites, off-site biodiversity units, carbon offsetting, highway works. On small schemes a fixed contribution of this kind can be given by unilateral undertaking.
The council resolves to grant subject to an agreement; its solicitors and yours draft the deed; the permission is usually issued when it is signed. On The Laurels and on four houses at Burton Green, that took four and a half months after the committee vote.
The time is shortest where the heads of terms (the short list of what the deed will contain) are agreed before committee and the title is clean. Everyone with an interest in the land, mortgagees included, normally has to sign.
Viability is the other lever. The Framework assumes a scheme that meets up-to-date plan policies is viable, says the price paid for land is no justification for doing less and expects a viability assessment to be published (policy DM5). Where a reduced contribution is accepted, the deed may include a review that tests viability again later.
Councils usually ask the applicant to pay their legal costs. They may also charge a fee for monitoring the obligations, if it is fairly related in scale and kind to the development and no more than the cost of the monitoring.
Three: necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms, directly related to it and fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind.
The three tests for a section 106 obligation are set in regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010; an obligation that fails any of them cannot lawfully be a reason for granting permission. They apply to the council when it asks and to an inspector deciding an appeal, who cannot rely on any obligation that fails them. In practice they test each line of the heads of terms. What impact of this scheme does the obligation answer? Is the amount sized to that impact rather than to a wider shortfall the scheme did not cause?
A section 106 obligation given by those with an interest in the land, without the council signing. It binds the land like an agreement.
At appeal it lets the appellant offer the obligations the scheme needs, so the inspector can weigh them. The Planning Inspectorate expects it early: an executed, certified copy with a written representations appeal, or an agreed final draft 10 working days before a hearing or inquiry. Anything later is at the inspector's discretion. For applications made since 1 April 2026 it expects obligations with the application and takes one at appeal only in exceptional circumstances, with an explanation. A fixed contribution towards a protected habitat site is often given this way.
Yes. By agreement with the council at any time, or by application once five years have passed, with a right of appeal.
The five years run from the date the section 106 agreement was entered into. The test on an application is whether the obligation still serves a useful purpose. If it does not, it should be discharged; if it would serve that purpose equally well in a different form, it should be modified. Commercial difficulty is not, on its own, the test. Before five years, the only route is a new agreement, which needs the council to agree. A deed of variation is the usual instrument; it is often paired with a fresh planning application where the scheme itself is changing.
Yes. A section 106 is registered against the land as a local land charge and binds anyone who takes the land from whoever signed it.
That is the point of the mechanism: the obligation runs with the land, not with the applicant, so a buyer inherits it. A well-drafted deed releases a person once they have parted with their interest. It also releases individual homeowners and their mortgagees from obligations aimed at the developer, which is what keeps the finished houses saleable. A buyer of land with a permission should read the deed alongside the decision notice, because the deed is where the cost of the permission is written.
CIL is a fixed charge per square metre set in advance; a section 106 is negotiated for each scheme and limited to its needs.
Where a council charges the Community Infrastructure Levy, general infrastructure is funded through it; the section 106 is kept for affordable housing and for mitigation specific to the site. A scheme can pay both. Since 2019 a council can also use both towards the same piece of infrastructure. The levy is not negotiable in the same way, but it has exemptions and reliefs of its own, covered in the guide to the Community Infrastructure Levy.
The permission is not issued. If the deed is not completed in the agreed time, the council can refuse the application or leave it undetermined.
A resolution to grant subject to a section 106 agreement is not a permission, however long it has stood; it can be revisited if policy changes while the deed is being drafted. National guidance says obligations should be negotiated within the statutory time limits or a longer period agreed in writing. It says a council is justified in refusing where an applicant causes deliberate delay and will not agree an extension. The way to avoid all of it is to treat the deed as part of the application: heads of terms agreed early, title checked and everyone with an interest in the land ready to sign.
A reduction in the affordable housing due on a scheme that reuses or redevelops vacant buildings, in proportion to their floorspace.
It is set out in the Framework of August 2026 (policy HO8), which says any affordable housing due should be reduced in proportion to the gross floorspace of the vacant buildings. Because affordable housing is usually secured through the section 106, the credit reduces what the deed has to carry. It does not apply to buildings that have been abandoned, or to major development on land within or released from the Green Belt, which has its own golden rules. Whether a building counts as vacant rather than abandoned is the council's judgement on the evidence, which is worth assembling before the heads of terms are discussed.
Sometimes. The Framework expects affordable homes on the site, but accepts a nearby site or a payment in lieu where the evidence justifies it.
Off-site delivery is accepted where it would optimise the quality or quantity of affordable homes built; a payment in lieu where it is justified on firm evidence and contributes to mixed and balanced communities (policy HO8). On small schemes, where a few affordable homes can be hard to place with a provider, a payment may be agreed, but it still has to be justified to that standard. Either way it is secured in the section 106. Where the council's plan sets a method for calculating it, it is worth agreeing that method early, because it drives the figure.
Every rule here was read on 14 October 2026 in the Act, the regulations, the Framework of 17 August 2026 and the guidance below. It explains the system; it is not legal advice.
Rickett Architects
A RIBA Chartered practice, working since 1970, with more than 2,500 projects behind it. Our senior architects take projects from first survey through planning to completion, for private clients, developers and landowners across the Midlands and well beyond it.
Tell us about your project
A Senior Architect will reply. We will give you an initial appraisal and guide you as to what to do next.