Not sure what limits your site?
Send us your project and where it is. A Senior Architect will give you an initial appraisal and guide you as to what to do next.
Start a conversationWhat each limit means, how to find it and which can be lifted.
Planning restrictions come in two kinds. Designations such as Green Belt, conservation areas and listed buildings set the test a site is judged against; some also cut permitted development rights. Conditions, Article 4 directions, tree preservation orders and section 106 obligations restrict the property itself. Many can be changed.
Restrictions can arrive several at a time. This plot carried four constraints at once and the council's first written answer was that it was unlikely to support the scheme.
A 1920s house on a wooded plot near Kenilworth town centre, next to the conservation area, beside a grade II listed building, with five trees under a 1982 tree preservation order and badgers on the site. A developer wanted apartments in its place and the pre-application tested seven to nine.
The pre-application response named five things a scheme would have to prove: no harm to the street scene, the conservation area, the protected trees or the listed setting, plus proper screening. That list became the brief.
The trees fixed the access. The only workable new entrance ran between a copper beech and an Atlas cedar, both protected; it was set between their root protection areas without cutting into either. Four of the five protected trees were kept; the fifth was already dead and was to be replaced.
The conservation area appraisal asked for large houses in substantial gardens, so the building was split into three wings that read as one large house; its lowest floor was set into the five-metre fall of the site. Keeping the mature boundary planting answered the screening test.
None of those constraints went away. Each was a test with an answer and the answers were designed in before the application. Permission came at the first attempt, with fifteen conditions.
Nine homes on the edge of a village inside the Cotswolds National Landscape, three of them affordable. Refused by the district council and allowed at appeal in October 2025 on a housing land shortfall, with landscape harm found slight.
A grade II listed Regency house in a Leamington conservation area. Within its curtilage even a new garden wall is not permitted development; this one had listed building consent, with piers and foundations designed around the trees.
Thirty homes at Chipping Campden in the Cotswolds, on an outline already consented. Our reserved matters and four condition discharges settled detail down to the coursing: stone sample panels built on site and window reveals at least 75 millimetres deep.
The permission that created this house had removed its householder permitted development rights, so a modest addition needed a householder application rather than none. It was granted, with two conditions.
Every planning application we make in our own name is a matter of public record on a council register, and ours reach more than 100 planning authorities across the UK.
Feasibility and site appraisal →Send us your project and where it is. A Senior Architect will give you an initial appraisal and guide you as to what to do next.
→ Start a conversationDesignations, permissions, conditions and registered charges are on public records and can be checked before a purchase or a drawing. The council's policies map shows where its plan policies apply, including designations such as the Green Belt. Its planning register holds every application made for the property, with the decision and any conditions.
If those records, a land charges search, the council's Article 4 directions and the title all show nothing relevant, an ordinary application or permitted development is likely to be the route.
A local land charges search adds what public bodies have registered against the land. The National Heritage List for England shows listed buildings, though curtilage structures can be covered without an entry. The flood map for planning shows the flood zone.
The title is a separate check. Restrictive covenants and easements are private rights found in the title and the deeds, not in the planning register. A planning search will not find them.
Each kind of restriction written onto a property has its own procedure for changing it; ignoring one invites enforcement, though a long, proven breach of a condition can become lawful.
Written onto the permission that created or altered the property: occupancy ties, removed permitted development rights, materials, hours of use. An application under section 73 can ask to vary or remove one.
A council direction withdrawing permitted development rights across an area, so work that would otherwise need no application needs one. An owner cannot opt out; a planning application is the way through, at the normal fee.
A tree preservation order makes it an offence to cut down, top, lop, uproot or wilfully damage a protected tree without the council's consent. In a conservation area, most tree work needs six weeks' notice first.
A deed binding the land, which can restrict how a property is used or who may occupy it, such as local occupancy or an affordable tenure. It can be changed by agreement at any time, or by application after five years.
These come with the place rather than the paperwork, so an owner cannot lift them. None is a ban in law, though flood policy says some uses should be refused and some designations set a high bar. Each sets a written test and each has a guide of its own.
Development is inappropriate, and harmful by definition, unless it fits a category the Framework lists, such as a replacement building in the same use and no materially larger, or limited infilling in a village (policies GB6 and GB7).
The law requires special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing an area's character or appearance. Some permitted development rights are withdrawn, demolition and tree work come under control and buildings that contribute should be kept where possible (policy HE9).
A separate consent, with no fee, is needed for any work affecting a listed building's character, inside or out. Structures in its curtilage since before 1 July 1948 count as part of it unless the list entry excludes them.
The sequential test asks whether a site at lower risk is reasonably available, though householder work and most changes of use are exempt. Some development must also pass the exception test and some uses should be refused (policies F5 and F6).
Outside settlements, only the forms of development the Framework lists should be approved. An isolated new home needs one of five circumstances, from a rural worker's essential need to a design that is truly outstanding (policies S5 and HO11).
Protected species law works through licences. Where bats, newts or nesting birds may be present, the council needs survey evidence before it can decide, and the surveys after the first assessment run only in season.
One designation has no guide of its own. A National Landscape is still, in law, an area of outstanding natural beauty. There, development should be limited in scale and extent, and major development refused except in exceptional circumstances where it is in the public interest (policy N4).
Possibly. An application to remove it is judged against local and national policy; after ten years' breach, a certificate can confirm the breach is lawful.
An application can vary the tie or remove the restriction altogether. National guidance says nothing about removing a tie, so the council's local plan policy is the starting point, though the Framework says a policy materially at odds with it should carry very limited weight. Where a plan asks for marketing evidence, the period and the price it expects are the heart of the application. The second route applies where the condition has been breached continuously for ten years, for instance by someone outside farming living there. The breach is then immune from enforcement and a certificate can record the use as lawful, but the condition itself stays on the permission; the evidence of the whole decade has to hold up.
No. A covenant is a private obligation in the title deeds, enforced by whoever has its benefit; a planning permission does not release it.
The two systems run side by side: the council can grant permission for a scheme that breaches a covenant and a restrictive covenant can stop a scheme the council has approved. The routes round one are private: a release negotiated with whoever has the benefit of it, or an application to the Upper Tribunal to discharge or modify it, on grounds such as the covenant being obsolete. Planning permission counts in the Tribunal's decision but does not decide it; in 2020 the Supreme Court refused to lift a covenant even though homes had been built with permission.
Not without giving the council six weeks' notice, unless an exemption applies or it agrees sooner.
The wait gives the council time to decide whether to make a tree preservation order; the restriction applies even where no building work is planned. The notice is required for most work to trees in a conservation area, not only felling: lopping and topping too. Small trees fall below the threshold, measured as a trunk diameter at 1.5 metres above the ground. If the council does nothing in six weeks the work can go ahead, but only for two years from the notice. If it makes an order, consent is then needed under the order like any other protected tree. Working without notice is an offence of the same order as damaging a protected tree.
The council can serve a breach of condition notice, which has no right of appeal, or an enforcement notice. It has ten years to act.
The ten years run from the start of the breach. Failing to comply with a breach of condition notice is a criminal offence. An enforcement notice can be appealed and the appeal can argue that permission should be granted for what has happened. The Framework of August 2026 adds that where unauthorised development was intentional, that should weigh substantially against a retrospective application (policy DM8). A condition is a binding restriction, so the sensible order is the reverse: apply to vary the condition first, then act on the answer.
Yes. Works affecting a listed building's character without listed building consent are a criminal offence, with no time limit after which they become lawful.
Listing restricts the interior as well as the exterior. Anything fixed to the building counts as part of it, whatever its age, unless the list entry excludes it; so do structures in its curtilage that have been there since before 1 July 1948. The council can require unauthorised works to be reversed and can serve that notice on later owners, so a buyer should ask for the consents behind any alteration. Consent depends on whether works affect the building's character, so check even like-for-like repair with the council before starting.
The restrictions public bodies have registered against the land: planning conditions since 1977, conservation areas, listed buildings, tree preservation orders and section 106 obligations.
It is the search a buyer's solicitor orders. HM Land Registry has taken over the register for many councils; the rest keep their own. A charge binds the land even if it was never registered and a newly made tree preservation order may not show yet, so ask the council about trees and check its published Article 4 directions as well. Restrictive covenants are in the title, not the search; the planning history is worth reading in full alongside both.
Yes. A council can make a tree preservation order, an Article 4 direction or a new conservation area, all without the owner's consent.
A building can also be listed without the owner's consent. Listing is decided by the Secretary of State on Historic England's advice; a council can protect a building temporarily while that is considered. A tree preservation order takes effect provisionally the day it is made and its protection ends after six months unless the council confirms it. An Article 4 direction can take immediate effect for some rights. Orders and directions have a period for objections. A full planning permission already granted still allows the tree work needed to carry it out.
Yes. Conditions, Article 4 directions, tree preservation orders and designations all attach to the land, as does a section 106 obligation.
A permission runs with the land rather than the applicant and so do its conditions. Directions, orders and designations are made against places, not people. A section 106 deed binds successors in title, although it can release a person once they have parted with their interest if the deed says so. The practical consequence is that a purchase inherits every restriction already in place, which is why the time to find them is before contracts are exchanged.
Each rule here comes from the sources below.
Rickett Architects
A RIBA Chartered practice, working since 1970, with more than 2,500 projects behind it. Our senior architects take projects from first survey through planning to completion, for private clients, developers and landowners across the Midlands and well beyond it.
Tell us about your project
A Senior Architect will reply. We will give you an initial appraisal and guide you as to what to do next.