Case study  /  Leamington Spa

Kenilworth Road, demolished and replaced.

A post-war house gone, a contemporary home in its place. Approved without a committee.

The completed contemporary house on Kenilworth Road, Royal Leamington Spa, seen across its garden in low evening light: an upper storey of figured timber rainscreen and red brick carried on a preweathered zinc band, cantilevered over a recessed ground floor of full height glazing, with a striped lawn in front

The garden elevation, early evening. Photograph of the completed house, relit for this case study.

The facts

A replacement house in Leamington Spa.

A tired post-war dwelling on a backland plot inside a Leamington Spa conservation area, taken from the first sketch through to the finished home.

The project

One house, built to last.

266sqm, built and lived in
Location
Kenilworth Road, Royal Leamington Spa
Setting
A Leamington Spa conservation area, on a backland plot
Client
A private family, anonymised by agreement
Consent
06/0012, Warwick District Council, granted under delegated powers February 2006
Status
Built and lived in since 2007

Consent to demolish and rebuild, eight weeks after the application was validated.

The brief

A good plot, a poor house.

The family had an enviable site off one of Leamington's leafier streets: a backland plot, set behind the road and reached by its own long private drive. The house on it was the problem. An undistinguished post-war dwelling, tired, and with little to offer the people who wanted to live there.

They wanted it replaced with a genuinely contemporary, light filled, low energy family home. And they wanted one practice to hold the whole thing, from the first sketch to the keys.

Accommodation
Five bedrooms over three levels, about 266 sqm, with a detached double garage of about 42 sqm
Route
One full planning application, for the demolition and the replacement house together.
Our role
Architect at every stage, pre-application to completion on site.
The planning journey

Applied January. Granted February.

Planning journey for the house on Kenilworth Road, Royal Leamington Spa: pre-application discussions from 2004; the application submitted in January 2006; planning permission granted under delegated powers on 28 February 2006; demolition in 2006 once the bat survey was cleared; built on site through 2006 and 2007; and completed and occupied in 2007, with Rickett Architects acting from pre-application through to completion on site

Validated in the January, determined in the February, and occupied the following year. Permission ref 06/0012, Warwick District Council.

The house

Modern, and made to belong.

Brick from the coach houses and ancillary buildings around it, carrying a lighter storey of timber and zinc, with the ground floor opened to the garden.

The corner

Brick, timber, zinc.

The upper storey is carried on a zinc band and cantilevered clear of the glazing below.

The corner of the completed house on Kenilworth Road, Royal Leamington Spa: an upper storey of figured timber rainscreen panels and red facing brick wrapped in preweathered zinc, cantilevered over a fully glazed corner at ground level, with the dappled shadow of a mature tree across the zinc
Inside

Open to the garden.

Living and dining run together and turn the corner in glass. Restyled for this case study.

Inside the completed house on Kenilworth Road, Royal Leamington Spa: an open living and dining space with a walnut floor, opening through full height corner glazing to the walled garden and lawn beyond
The stair

Walnut and glass.

A bespoke stair sits at the middle of the plan, lit from a rooflight above. Restyled for this case study.

The bespoke stair and first floor landing in the completed house on Kenilworth Road, Royal Leamington Spa: a walnut handrail and solid walnut treads with a frameless glass balustrade, on a pale timber floor
The drawings

The drawings behind it.

A long, low elevation, and a plan that is open below and private above.

The front

A long, low horizontal.

A continuous glazed band above, full height openings below, and a shallow mono-pitch capping the whole.

The composition is deliberately horizontal, so a two storey house reads low against its neighbours.

The flanks

Stepped, and kept low.

The massing steps down toward the boundaries, which is how a modern house of this size stays neighbourly on a backland plot.

Ground floor

One open floor.

Living, dining and kitchen run together around the central hall and stair, with the glazing turning the corner to the garden.

First floor

Five bedrooms above.

Five bedrooms around the landing, the principal suite with its own dressing room and en-suite. The open plan is downstairs; upstairs is private.

The challenge

The safe answer was pastiche.

This is where modern design is hardest to win.

Taking a building down inside a conservation area has to be justified, and whatever replaces it is judged hard. The easy route was a house that looked old. The family wanted a modern one, and so did we.

Discuss your site
The post-war house that stood on the plot at Kenilworth Road, Royal Leamington Spa, photographed on a foggy morning before demolition: a tired two storey dwelling clad in white painted weatherboarding with a mossy tiled roof, a striped awning over the side door and cars parked on the hardstanding in front

Three things had to line up: consent to take the old house down, a modern design the council would actively support rather than merely tolerate, and a backland plot with neighbours close on either side.

The full story

A conservation area is precisely where a modern building is most likely to be refused. The designation exists to protect a character that is already there, and the path of least resistance is always a house that imitates its neighbours. That was the option on the table. The family did not want it, and neither did we, so the case had to be made properly rather than avoided.

The site set its own terms as well. This is a backland plot, reached by a long private drive from Kenilworth Road, with houses close on either side, so the new home had to sit comfortably among neighbours who would look onto it. The county ecologist required a bat survey before the application could be determined, not after, and a mature boundary tree had to be kept and protected through the build.

The answer was to argue the design on its merits and to get that argument settled before the application was ever submitted. Through pre-application we worked the external palette with the council's case officer until the house drew its brick from the coach houses and ancillary buildings around it while making no pretence of being old. The conservation area advisory forum raised no objection. Permission followed under delegated powers on 28 February 2006, eight weeks after validation, without ever going to committee. In a conservation area, a contemporary house approved by an officer rather than fought through a committee is the harder and the better outcome.

What we did

First sketch to finished house.

One practice held the whole project, so the design, the planning case and the building on site never changed hands.

The consent

We settled it before submitting.

Problem
A demolition and an unapologetically modern replacement, inside a conservation area
Move
Pre-application with the case officer, working the external palette until the design was supported
Ecology
A bat survey commissioned and cleared before determination, as the county ecologist required
Outcome
Granted under delegated powers, with no objection from the conservation area advisory forum

A modern house in a conservation area, approved by an officer rather than fought at committee.

The house

Crafted, and quietly efficient.

Walls
Facing brick by Desimpel, with a figured timber rainscreen by Prodema to the upper storey
Roof and trim
Preweathered zinc by Rheinzink to the parapet, copings and the cantilevered bay
Glazing
Bespoke Fineline aluminium, full height, turning the corner on fixed lights
Energy
A ground source heat pump and underfloor heating, part funded by a Low Carbon Buildings Programme grant

An early heat pump in a one-off house, and an EPC of C72 for a home built in 2007.

The delivery

Consent was the halfway point.

Conditions
Materials, large scale eaves and window details and the external works, all discharged
Demolition
Taken down to the agreed method, with the mature boundary tree retained and protected
Technical
The full construction package, including the bespoke walnut and glass stair
On site
Built under a JCT contract, with the practice involved from demolition through to completion

Designed, consented and delivered by one practice, with a single point of accountability throughout.

Tell us about your project

Thinking of replacing what is there?

A Senior Architect will reply. We will give you an initial appraisal and guide you as to what to do next.

Your enquiry will go directly to a Senior Architect.

Thank you. A Senior Architect will reply personally.
Something went wrong sending this. Please call 01926 967 090 or email studio@rickett.co.uk.